Navigating the Benefits and Procedure of Filing a Motion to Suppress Evidence in a Massachusetts Criminal Case: A Legal Guide


In a Massachusetts criminal case, the option to file a motion to suppress evidence can be a powerful legal strategy. This motion allows defendants to challenge the admissibility of certain evidence on grounds of constitutional violations. Understanding the procedure and potential benefits of filing a motion to suppress is crucial for individuals seeking to protect their rights and build a strong defense against criminal charges.

1. Legal Basis and Constitutional Rights:

The Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution protects individuals from unreasonable searches and seizures. Filing a motion to suppress is grounded in the argument that evidence was obtained unlawfully, violating a defendant's constitutional rights to privacy and protection from government overreach.

2. Common Grounds for Suppression in Massachusetts:

Unlawful searches and seizures, lack of probable cause, violations of Miranda rights, and improper handling of evidence are common grounds for filing a motion to suppress in Massachusetts. The Commonwealth's legal system recognizes the importance of upholding these constitutional rights in the pursuit of justice.

3. Procedure for Filing a Motion to Suppress:

The motion is typically filed before the trial begins. It should not only clearly articulate the legal basis for suppression but also provide specific details regarding the alleged constitutional violation. A meticulously prepared motion enhances the likelihood of a favorable outcome.

4. Timing and Adherence to Deadlines:

Strict adherence to deadlines is crucial when filing a motion to suppress. Timely submission ensures that the court considers the motion as part of the pre-trial proceedings, providing the defense with an opportunity to address the legality of the evidence against them.

5. Affidavits and Supporting Evidence:

Supporting the motion with sworn affidavits and relevant evidence is essential. This may include witness statements, photographs, or documentation that substantiates the claim of an unlawful search or seizure. A comprehensive presentation strengthens the motion and the defense's position.

6. Hearing on the Motion:

The court will schedule a hearing to review the motion. Both the prosecution and defense will have the opportunity to present arguments and evidence. A well-prepared defense is key to success during this critical phase, where the judge evaluates the legality of the evidence in question.

7. Arguments During the Hearing:

The defense may present legal arguments, challenging the validity of the search warrant, questioning the credibility of witnesses, or asserting that law enforcement exceeded the scope of the warrant. Effective arguments and the presentation of compelling evidence are central to the success of the motion.

8. Judge's Ruling:

Following the hearing, the judge will make a ruling on the admissibility of the evidence. If the motion is granted, the evidence is suppressed and cannot be used against the defendant in court, significantly impacting the strength of the prosecution's case.

9. Benefits of a Successful Motion to Suppress:

Strengthened Defense: Successfully suppressing evidence can weaken the prosecution's case, making it more challenging for them to prove guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. This can create opportunities for a more favorable outcome, including a reduction of charges or even case dismissal.

Negotiation Leverage: A successful motion can provide the defense with leverage during plea negotiations, potentially leading to a more favorable resolution. The prosecution may be more inclined to negotiate if key evidence is deemed inadmissible.

Constitutional Protections: Filing a motion to suppress allows defendants to assert their constitutional rights actively. It serves as a safeguard against unlawful searches and seizures, contributing to the maintenance of a fair and just legal process.

10. Appeal and Further Proceedings:

If either party disagrees with the judge's ruling, they may choose to appeal. The appellate process allows for a review of the decision, ensuring that legal principles are applied appropriately. The case may proceed to trial, or parties may explore alternative resolutions depending on the outcome of the appeal.


Filing a motion to suppress evidence in a Massachusetts criminal case is a valuable legal tool that empowers defendants to protect their constitutional rights. Understanding the procedure and potential benefits can guide individuals through the complexities of the legal process, providing a robust defense against criminal charges. Consulting with an experienced criminal defense attorney is crucial to ensuring a well-prepared motion and effective presentation during the hearing, maximizing the chances of a successful outcome.

Client Reviews
"Highly Recommended. Attorney Patrick J. Murphy absolutely helped me out in my time of need. When I met him in his Boston office he put me right at ease and explained the criminal process to me in a way I could easily understand and in a manner that gave me complete confidence. I was facing a criminal wanton destruction of property charge in Barnstable District Court. On the day of the case, he was at the courthouse waiting for me and my wife. Mr. Murphy handled the hearing in a very thorough and professional manner putting us through our testimony and making a powerful argument to the decision maker. My case was thrown out and I could not be happier with the service from Attorney Murphy. I highly recommend him to you as a skilled legal advocate!" Rob, Avvo User
"Excellent Criminal Defense Lawyer. From the first consultation I knew Patrick Murphy was the right choice for my criminal defense. He was knowledgeable of the laws and knew how to build up a strong defense for my case. Every phone call and email I made was promptly answered. When it came time for my hearing, Patrick was prepared and able to get the criminal complaint against me dropped without ever becoming charge! Would highly recommend this attorney to anyone seeking a top quality defense attorney to handle their case!" John, Avvo User
"OUI Not Guilty Verdict. Patrick Murphy provided excellent service as council on my case. He worked diligently over a long legal process that spanned over 3 years. He was able to take my case to a Jury Trial and get me a Not Guilty verdict through he expert knowledge of the law and expertise in cross examination of the prosecutions witnesses. He was very professional and available at anytime night or day to answer questions." Chris, Avvo User
"Highly Skilled and Professional Lawyer. Attorney Pat Murphy did a great job guiding me through an A&B charge, and most importantly getting the case dismissed in a very timely manner. He is very professional, returns call promptly, and did a great explaining his strategy and the legal process to me. I was confident throughout the whole process that I was in good hands and would receive the best possible outcome in my case. Would highly recommended Attorney Murphy." Avvo User
"I Felt That I was in Good Hands... and I Was! Mr. Patrick J. Murphy was very quick to respond to my needs. He was always there to answer any questions I had in a timely fashion, and he made me feel very comfortable in an extremely uncomfortable situation. Having Mr. Murphy by my side in the courtroom felt like I was at an advantage. He speaks with confidence. He doesn't stutter or pause while put on the spot. He treated me with respect. He listens. He always greeted me with a warm welcome and never wasted any time." Avvo User