Marijuana & OUI: Driving While High in Massachusetts

OUI Boston Criminal Defense Lawyer

A new report released by the AAA Foundation for Traffic Safety found that over 14 million Americans admit to driving within an hour of using marijuana. The effects of THC, the active compound in cannabis, on ability to drive are still unclear. At the end of 2012, Colorado and Washington were the first states in the nation to legalize recreational marijuana use. Since then, Colorado has seen an overall decrease in DUIs, while Washington state saw a slight uptick. In fact, of the fatal car accidents in Washington state in 2014, 1 in 6 drives had recently used marijuana.

Since weed was legalized in Massachusetts in 2016, nearly 20 dispensaries have opened in the state, with many more locations in the works. The legalization is expected to bring in tens of millions in tax revenue for the state, but some advocates are concerned about the effects on roadway safety. Addressing these concerns, Governor Charlie Baker is pushing a bill that would penalize drivers who refused to consent to a roadside marijuana impairment test.

The Problem With Penalizing Marijuana Impairment Test Refusal

The problem, however, is that there is no good way to measure how high someone is. There is no marijuana equivalent to a blood alcohol content (BAC) breathalyzer test. And a conclusive test for marijuana impairment is still years away and will be exceeding difficult to develop.

The Massachusetts American Civil Liberties Union spoke out against Gov. Baker’s proposed bill. Matt Allen, a field director for the organization, says that if a test is implemented and drivers are penalized for a refusal, that test should be based on evidence and science.

Lack of a conclusive test won’t stop the police and prosecutors in the Commonwealth from arresting and bringing OUI cases against drivers who are under the influence of marijuana. When you are pulled over and the police suspect you have been drinking, you have the right to refuse a breathalyzer. Refusing a BAC test will result in the automatic suspension of your license for a time dependent on your OUI history, but a refusal cannot be used against you during a criminal prosecution. This is what Gov. Baker is proposing for drivers suspected of driving while high.

Defending an OUI Case: Alcohol vs. Marijuana

Marijuana OUIs will be prosecuted under the same statute as all other OUIs, M.G.L. c. 90 § 24, which requires the Commonwealth to prove the following three elements beyond a reasonable doubt:

  1. The vehicle (or boat, aircraft, tractor, etc.) was operated,
  2. On a public way or other area that members of the public have a right of access to, and
  3. The operator of the vehicle was under the influence of some intoxicant.

The Commonwealth brings thousands of OUI cases every year that involve breathalyzer refusals. When the breathalyzer test is refused, the third element is often established with the arresting officer’s testimony about things like: bloodshot eyes, odor of alcohol, and field sobriety tests.

Even if you refuse a roadside marijuana impairment test, the Commonwealth may rely on following types of evidence to bring a case against you:

  • Bloodshot eyes
  • Marijuana smell
  • Field sobriety test
  • Interview with a drug recognition officer
  • Speech mannerisms, including lethargic speech
Hire a Criminal Lawyer with Experience Defending OUI Cases

With all the publicity surrounding driving while high, District Attorneys will likely take these types of cases seriously. If you are facing an OUI charge for driving while high, you should hire an aggressive criminal defense lawyer who you trust and who will fight for your rights. The Law Office of Patrick J. Murphy has twenty-five years of experience defending these types of cases.

If you want to discuss your marijuana OUI criminal charge with an experienced attorney, Attorney Murphy provides a complementary and confidential consultation. Attorney Murphy can be reached 24/7 at (617) 367-0450, or you can use this online form to set up an appointment.

Client Reviews
"Highly Recommended. Attorney Patrick J. Murphy absolutely helped me out in my time of need. When I met him in his Boston office he put me right at ease and explained the criminal process to me in a way I could easily understand and in a manner that gave me complete confidence. I was facing a criminal wanton destruction of property charge in Barnstable District Court. On the day of the case, he was at the courthouse waiting for me and my wife. Mr. Murphy handled the hearing in a very thorough and professional manner putting us through our testimony and making a powerful argument to the decision maker. My case was thrown out and I could not be happier with the service from Attorney Murphy. I highly recommend him to you as a skilled legal advocate!" Rob, Avvo User
"Excellent Criminal Defense Lawyer. From the first consultation I knew Patrick Murphy was the right choice for my criminal defense. He was knowledgeable of the laws and knew how to build up a strong defense for my case. Every phone call and email I made was promptly answered. When it came time for my hearing, Patrick was prepared and able to get the criminal complaint against me dropped without ever becoming charge! Would highly recommend this attorney to anyone seeking a top quality defense attorney to handle their case!" John, Avvo User
"OUI Not Guilty Verdict. Patrick Murphy provided excellent service as council on my case. He worked diligently over a long legal process that spanned over 3 years. He was able to take my case to a Jury Trial and get me a Not Guilty verdict through he expert knowledge of the law and expertise in cross examination of the prosecutions witnesses. He was very professional and available at anytime night or day to answer questions." Chris, Avvo User
"Highly Skilled and Professional Lawyer. Attorney Pat Murphy did a great job guiding me through an A&B charge, and most importantly getting the case dismissed in a very timely manner. He is very professional, returns call promptly, and did a great explaining his strategy and the legal process to me. I was confident throughout the whole process that I was in good hands and would receive the best possible outcome in my case. Would highly recommended Attorney Murphy." Avvo User
"I Felt That I was in Good Hands... and I Was! Mr. Patrick J. Murphy was very quick to respond to my needs. He was always there to answer any questions I had in a timely fashion, and he made me feel very comfortable in an extremely uncomfortable situation. Having Mr. Murphy by my side in the courtroom felt like I was at an advantage. He speaks with confidence. He doesn't stutter or pause while put on the spot. He treated me with respect. He listens. He always greeted me with a warm welcome and never wasted any time." Avvo User