Mail Fraud

The crime of fraud is broadly defined as an act where a person or a company uses false information to collect money or other benefits. Mail fraud encompasses any type of fraud perpetrated through the United States Postal Service and is governed by 18 USC 63 of the United States Code. The mail fraud statute was first enacted in 1872 to prohibit illicit mailings with the Postal Service (formerly the Post Office) for the purpose of executing a fraudulent scheme. In 1994 Congress expanded the use of the mails to include any parcel that is "sent or delivered by a private or commercial interstate carrier." As a result of these amendments, the mail fraud statute has become a broad act for prosecution of dishonest and fraudulent activities, as long as those crimes involve the mails or an interstate carrier. Mail fraud may be committed against and by both businesses and individuals, and includes charges of bank fraud, identity theft, investment fraud, or tax fraud. Often times, the prosecution will seek mail fraud indictments against defendants in cases where they have insufficient evidence for an alternative charge. Charges of mail fraud may also be added on to other charges such as tax fraud, bank fraud, mortgage fraud, health care fraud, and securities fraud, in order to increase potential sentences for defendants. If you are charged or investigated for a mail fraud offense, your first concern should be adequate legal representation by an experienced Massachusetts criminal defense attorney.

In order for the prosecution to secure a conviction for the federal crime of mail fraud, they must be able to prove four elements beyond a reasonable doubt:

  1. The defendant knowingly devised or participated in a scheme to defraud, or for obtaining money or property by means of false or fraudulent pretenses, representations or promises;
  2. The false or fraudulent pretenses, representations or promises related to a material fact;
  3. The defendant acted willfully with an intent to defraud; and
  4. The defendant used the United States Postal Service by mailing or by causing to be mailed or the defendant used a private or commercial interstate carrier by depositing or causing to be deposited with such carrier some matter or thing for the purpose of executing the scheme to defraud. Schmuck v. United States.
Penalties Attached to Mail Fraud Crimes

A conviction for mail fraud can carry severe and devastating penalties including jail time, heavy fines and a permanent criminal record. Punishment for a conviction under the mail fraud statute will result in a fine, imprisonment for not more than five years, or both. If, however, the violation affects a financial institution, the punishment is more severe: the statute provides that the person shall be fined not more than $1,000,000 or imprisoned not more than 30 years, or both.

Mail Fraud Defense Designed for Your Case

Mail fraud is a serious offense that may result in both state and federal charges. If you have been investigated or charged with a theft crime such as mail fraud, you need an aggressive and experienced Massachusetts mail fraud defense lawyer to fight the charges against you. At the Law Office of Patrick J. Murphy, our Massachusetts mail fraud defense firm investigates the federal issues of each mail fraud case thoroughly and strives to construct the most persuasive defense strategy. Ensure your rights are protected and your freedom is secure; contact the Law Office of Patrick J. Murphy 24/7 by calling (617) 367-0450 or emailing us directly using our online contact form.

Client Reviews
"Highly Recommended. Attorney Patrick J. Murphy absolutely helped me out in my time of need. When I met him in his Boston office he put me right at ease and explained the criminal process to me in a way I could easily understand and in a manner that gave me complete confidence. I was facing a criminal wanton destruction of property charge in Barnstable District Court. On the day of the case, he was at the courthouse waiting for me and my wife. Mr. Murphy handled the hearing in a very thorough and professional manner putting us through our testimony and making a powerful argument to the decision maker. My case was thrown out and I could not be happier with the service from Attorney Murphy. I highly recommend him to you as a skilled legal advocate!" Rob, Avvo User
"Excellent Criminal Defense Lawyer. From the first consultation I knew Patrick Murphy was the right choice for my criminal defense. He was knowledgeable of the laws and knew how to build up a strong defense for my case. Every phone call and email I made was promptly answered. When it came time for my hearing, Patrick was prepared and able to get the criminal complaint against me dropped without ever becoming charge! Would highly recommend this attorney to anyone seeking a top quality defense attorney to handle their case!" John, Avvo User
"OUI Not Guilty Verdict. Patrick Murphy provided excellent service as council on my case. He worked diligently over a long legal process that spanned over 3 years. He was able to take my case to a Jury Trial and get me a Not Guilty verdict through he expert knowledge of the law and expertise in cross examination of the prosecutions witnesses. He was very professional and available at anytime night or day to answer questions." Chris, Avvo User
"Highly Skilled and Professional Lawyer. Attorney Pat Murphy did a great job guiding me through an A&B charge, and most importantly getting the case dismissed in a very timely manner. He is very professional, returns call promptly, and did a great explaining his strategy and the legal process to me. I was confident throughout the whole process that I was in good hands and would receive the best possible outcome in my case. Would highly recommended Attorney Murphy." Avvo User
"I Felt That I was in Good Hands... and I Was! Mr. Patrick J. Murphy was very quick to respond to my needs. He was always there to answer any questions I had in a timely fashion, and he made me feel very comfortable in an extremely uncomfortable situation. Having Mr. Murphy by my side in the courtroom felt like I was at an advantage. He speaks with confidence. He doesn't stutter or pause while put on the spot. He treated me with respect. He listens. He always greeted me with a warm welcome and never wasted any time." Avvo User