Assault and Battery Causing Serious Injury

The crime of assault and battery causing serious injury is a felony crime in Massachusetts that requires serious legal representation. A person who commits and intentional or reckless assault and battery that results in serious injury to an alleged victim will be charged pursuant to Mass. G.L. c. 265, § 13(b)(i) and punished by a sentence of up to 5 years or by a fine of not more than $5,000, or by both a fine and prison time. This crime differs from simple assault and battery because it requires evidence or proof of a permanent disfigurement, loss of impairment of a bodily function, organ, limb, or a substantial risk of death.

In order for the prosecution to prove that a defendant committed an intentional assault and battery causing serious injury in Massachusetts, four elements must be established beyond a reasonable doubt:

  1. The defendant must have touched the person of the alleged victim without having any right or excuse for having done so;
  2. The defendant must have intended to touch the alleged victim;
  3. The touching by the defendant must have been either likely to cause bodily harm to the alleged victim or the touching was done without the alleged victim’s consent; and
  4. The defendant’s touching must have directly caused serious bodily injury to the alleged victim or must have directly and substantially set in motion a chain of events or occurrences that caused the serious injury in a natural and continuous sequence.

Under Massachusetts law, a serious bodily injury is defined as one that results in a permanent disfigurement, a loss of bodily function, the loss of a limb or bodily organ or a substantial risk of death.

The prosecution can proceed under either a theory of intentional assault and battery causing serious bodily injury or reckless assault and battery causing serious bodily injury. Under the reckless assault and battery theory, the government needs to prove that the defendant acted recklessly and that his reckless conduct included intentional action which caused serious bodily injury to the alleged victim.

An example of the application of this statute is instructive. In the case of Commonwealth v. Stephen M. Jean-Pierre, a defendant hit a victim's jaw and broke the jaw requiring the victim to be fed through a tube for six weeks. The victim eventually recovered. The defendant asserted that G.L. c. 265, § 13(b)(i) required that the impairment of bodily function to the victim must be permanent in order to constitute a serious bodily injury under the statute. The court rejected the defendant's argument and ruled that loss or impairment of a bodily function did not need to be “permanent” to meet the definition of "serious bodily injury" under the statute. The court determined that the term "permanent" applied only to "disfigurement" when it interpreted the statutory definition.

Assault and battery causing serious bodily injury is a significant crime in Massachusetts which requires a skilled criminal defense lawyer with significant courtroom experience and ability to utilize expert testimony, when needed, to challenge and dispute the medical evidence presented by the prosecution. Contact the Law Office of Patrick J. Murphy today for a free and helpful legal consultation on case.

Client Reviews
"Highly Recommended. Attorney Patrick J. Murphy absolutely helped me out in my time of need. When I met him in his Boston office he put me right at ease and explained the criminal process to me in a way I could easily understand and in a manner that gave me complete confidence. I was facing a criminal wanton destruction of property charge in Barnstable District Court. On the day of the case, he was at the courthouse waiting for me and my wife. Mr. Murphy handled the hearing in a very thorough and professional manner putting us through our testimony and making a powerful argument to the decision maker. My case was thrown out and I could not be happier with the service from Attorney Murphy. I highly recommend him to you as a skilled legal advocate!" Rob, Avvo User
"Excellent Criminal Defense Lawyer. From the first consultation I knew Patrick Murphy was the right choice for my criminal defense. He was knowledgeable of the laws and knew how to build up a strong defense for my case. Every phone call and email I made was promptly answered. When it came time for my hearing, Patrick was prepared and able to get the criminal complaint against me dropped without ever becoming charge! Would highly recommend this attorney to anyone seeking a top quality defense attorney to handle their case!" John, Avvo User
"OUI Not Guilty Verdict. Patrick Murphy provided excellent service as council on my case. He worked diligently over a long legal process that spanned over 3 years. He was able to take my case to a Jury Trial and get me a Not Guilty verdict through he expert knowledge of the law and expertise in cross examination of the prosecutions witnesses. He was very professional and available at anytime night or day to answer questions." Chris, Avvo User
"Highly Skilled and Professional Lawyer. Attorney Pat Murphy did a great job guiding me through an A&B charge, and most importantly getting the case dismissed in a very timely manner. He is very professional, returns call promptly, and did a great explaining his strategy and the legal process to me. I was confident throughout the whole process that I was in good hands and would receive the best possible outcome in my case. Would highly recommended Attorney Murphy." Avvo User
"I Felt That I was in Good Hands... and I Was! Mr. Patrick J. Murphy was very quick to respond to my needs. He was always there to answer any questions I had in a timely fashion, and he made me feel very comfortable in an extremely uncomfortable situation. Having Mr. Murphy by my side in the courtroom felt like I was at an advantage. He speaks with confidence. He doesn't stutter or pause while put on the spot. He treated me with respect. He listens. He always greeted me with a warm welcome and never wasted any time." Avvo User